| ENHANCING CO-OPERATION
AMONG AFRICAN LAW SCHOOLS: COMPARATIVE LAW STUDIES WITHIN THE
AFRICAN CONTEXT
Paper 4
by Kivutha Kibwana
Centre for Human Rights
University of Pretoria
December 1993
Edited by Tshidi Mayimele
ABSTRACT
In this paper I enquire into the nature of comparative legal studies
in Africa, I conclude that African comparative legal enquiry,
although of immense value to the development of African law and
of African countries and the continent, is currently extremely
underdeveloped. Some reasons for this are offered. I then proceed
to highlight practical steps regarding the strengthening of African
comparative legal discipline.
The paper therefore can also be read as a partial proposal aimed
at catalysing further work to develop a full-fledged proposal
on how best to introduce a comprehensive scheme of African comparative
legal studies and tradition.
The Author
April 1992
INTRODUCTION
A major preoccupation of an African legal pedagogy and training
is the studying and teaching of and researching in foreign or
imported laws. This is largely a function of the legal systems
having been founded on imposed law as well as legislators continuing
to uncritically use foreign legal values, concepts, models and
rules. Usually, the legal scholar and legislator hardly address
the issues of autochthonizing borrowed law or deriving peculiarly
local laws. And yet the problems which need legal intervention
and rectification are essentially - and first and foremost - local
problems. Whenever the comparative method is applied in African
legal scholarship, the comparisons sought are those of the local
situation vis a vis the common law system, the civil law system
(including Roman and Roman Dutch law) and the Socialist law system.
Also the comparison may be undertaken between the local situation
and that obtaining in the former colonizing power. Whatever the
comparison, it tends to be outwardly directed, that is the comparison
of Africa and the developed Western world.
I wish to argue for a modification of this trend
so that there can be a development of and an emphasis on comparative
study inter se African countries and their legal systems.
VALUE OF COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY
Where we compare an individual African country's legal system
or components thereof to that/those of Western countries, it is
hoped that the problems besetting the African case can be seen
in sharper relief since the two systems are, historically, travelling
on the same path: that of the Western legal tradition. Pitfalls
that the West fell into can also be avoided. Also Africa does
not have to reinvent the wheel.
And yet the comparison may be between two seemingly similar but
dissimilar creatures. Even when the same law obtaining in a Western
country is transplanted onto African soil, it may not operate
in the same way owing to specific local conditions. If this is
so, the comparison of legal systems of countries which are by
and large similarly suited in economic, cultural, social, historical
etc. terms may yield more comparative and practical value. Africa
could solve her legal problems better if the experiences of all
her countries are described and analyzed and used in fashioning
common legal solutions.
Unfortunately, there is little comparison of African legal systems
inter se. Existing comparative African legal studies tend to compare
two neighbouring countries, or a region (eg East Africa or Western
Africa). As yet African legal scholars have not in principle agreed
that African comparative legal studies should be prioritized.
After such agreement, the relevant scholars would then have to
determine the province of the studies and then engage in them.
WHAT IS A LIKELY PROVINCE OF AFRICAN COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDIES?
The broad concern of African comparative legal studies would be
comparative study of laws, legal institutions, legal concepts,
legal values and cultures etc on a continent wide basis. Comparative
study could also be undertaken on a regional basis. For example
if several countries wish to trade together, the laws which regulate
trade in all the relevant countries can be collated for reference
and analysis to determine whether they will facilitate the anticipated
trade. Comparative study between two or slightly more countries
is also a proper concern of African comparative legal study. If
in the future greater harmonization of African laws is to occur
as we move towards continental unity, then comparative legal study
must be emphasized so that it reveals the similarities which must
be strengthened and the differences which must be explained and
resolved.
In African comparative legal study, one can
also examine:
-
¨ The legal systems of the Ancient African
civilizations, the extent to which such systems formed the
basis and/or influenced other legal systems and similarities/differences
between such systems and present African legal systems.
-
How foreign laws have fared on African soil.
Are the experiences of African countries similar? What makes
foreign laws do better in some African countries as compared
to others? (if at all).
-
Do any unique African features exist within
the present legal systems?
-
How have indigenous or customary laws fared?
-
How has law fared in each country as a discipline
and as a regulatory system?
-
What conditions give rise to the strengthening
of the legal system? For example in countries where the rule
of law, constitutionalism, human rights etc. are substantially
respected, what is the basis for this? What creates problems
vis a vis the institutionalization of the above values?
-
What families of legal systems operate in
Africa?
-
What constitutional systems operate in the
continent?
-
Is there any differences in the legal systems
of former socialist oriented and capitalist oriented countries?
What is their significance?
-
What distinctive differences exist in each
branch of the law?
-
What differences exist in legal education
and training and the legal profession?
Obviously these are random suggestions regarding
the avenues of comparative work. A comprehensive list has to be
developed after examining what comparative legal work exists in
Africa and in light of the usual scope of comparative legal study.
CONCRETE STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICAN COMPARATIVE
LEGAL TRADITION
Normally African legal scholars and other legal personnel have
contacts with counterparts in the former colonizing power or generally
the West. Usually, contacts inter se African legal scholars and
other personnel are very limited. We have to deliberately cultivate
these. To boost African comparative legal studies then, the following
could be undertaken.
1. Development of an association of law teachers to be called
Association of African Law Teachers (AALT). Such organization
could have regional and country chapters.
2. Development of an association of law students to be called
Association of African Law Students (AALS). Similarly this organization
could have regional and country chapters.
3. Through research and writing African legal scholars could develop
a theory regarding African comparative legal studies in Africa.
4. The subject of African Comparative Law should be developed
and made part of the law curriculum.
5. Law scholars should emphasize African comparative legal enquiry
especially in the students' research work.
6. Exchange of publications and other materials. The originating
country should ensure a translation into either English or French.
Case law and statutes would fall under this category.
7. Exchange of teachers and researchers. We must learn to take
sabbatical leave within Africa even if it is not financially rewarding.
8. Exchange of syllabi.
9. Student exchanges.
10. Competitions among students eg moots and other competitions.
11. There should be an attempt to develop similar law curricula
at least in a broad sense. We should unify the broad goals of
legal education. Whenever a country is developing or changing
law curriculum, it should invite as many other African law schools
as possible.
12. Compilation of list of law teachers specifying their teaching
and research interests.
13. Compilation of legal research on a country and subject basis.
14. Compilation of the law schools specifying any special interests
or distinctive feature(s) of any school.
15. Determination of the existence of any organization which has
an interest in African comparative legal studies (eg The African
Society of International and Comparative Law).
16. Organization of cross-country and regional and even continental
conferences, seminars, symposia etc. to enhance co-operation especially
among African law schools.
17. Develop substantially the same level of standards in teaching
so that similar law degrees are taken to be of equivalent status.
18. Standardize the manner of qualifying for practice of the law.
19. Interest students studying law abroad in the AALT (for postgraduate
students) and AALS (for undergraduate students). Regional chapters
could exist abroad. Indeed law teachers and researchers abroad
would belong to the relevant AALT chapter.
20. Develop a system of external examination which emphasizes
drawing on African legal expertise.
21. Develop similar standards for recruiting teachers. A system
of identifying persons - Africans and others - who have failed
as teachers in any one country should be devised. Such information
should be circulated to all African law schools.
22. Liaise with other continental or regional bodies engaged in
similar work in other disciplines.
23. Each country AALT and AALS chapter would liaise with relevant
national bodies which assist the chapter in its work.
24. Devise a mentor system in which distinguished African legal
scholars take under their wings young talented scholars who are
not necessarily in their institutions.
25. Develop a strategy for determining and popularizing research
priorities.
26. Discover and popularize the journals which are published in
Africa and elsewhere on African legal issues.
27. Develop a Journal or Journals' capacity as well as publish
a newsletter.
The above proposed agenda is by no means exhaustive. Some of the
suggestions may not be attainable especially in the short run.
Moreover, extensive funding is needed for actualizing the above
proposals. It is mandatory that most of such funding comes from
African countries and organizations. Foreign donors are rapidly
developing donor fatigue. Africans have to learn to start raising
funds for their important causes and projects internally.
CONCLUSION
Currently the discipline of African comparative legal studies
is very weak. African law schools tend to emphasize comparative
studies of their countries and the West or East. Such trend must
be reversed so that comparative legal studies inter se African
countries are emphasized without excluding comparison with foreign
countries. It is critical that African countries get to know what
each of them is doing. Only in the context of such knowledge can
the political and economic integration that will save Africa from
collapse and ruin take place.
To ensure the institutionalization of African comparative legal
studies, organizations for both law teachers and other legal personnel
and law students will have to be created. Ultimately, we should
develop an Institute of African Comparative Legal Studies which
will be a postgraduate and advanced research body.
Apart from establishing and popularizing African comparative legal
studies, the proposed AALT and AALS can give support to law teachers
and students who for some reason are targets of political persecution.
Both the AALT and AALS could also advise African governments on
constitutional, legal, law reform and related issues.
NOTE:
This paper was written for presententation at the Fourth Annual
Conference of the African Society of International and Comparative
Law, which was held in Novotel, Dakar, Senegal in April 1992.
At the time of writing the author was a senior
lecturer in the Department of Private Law, University of Nairobi,
Kenya. The author is presently the Dean of the Law Faculty, University
of Nairobi.
The Editor December 1993
|