- Details
By Dorcas Basimanyane and Lassané Ouedraogo
Fifteen years ago this year, the United Nations Human Rights Council endorsed the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, built on three ideas simple enough to fit on a napkin: states must protect human rights, businesses should respect them, and people harmed by corporate conduct must have somewhere to turn for a remedy. It was, at the level of language, a breakthrough. Before the UNGPs, “corporate responsibility” was merely a slogan; after them, it had a grammar. But read those three pillars again and notice the verb that governs business: should. Not must. The entire framework rests on a request, and a request is exactly what a mining company is free to decline.
- Details
By Dr Olayinka Adeniyi, a legal academic and human rights researcher, and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye, a human rights scholar from the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
Every failed public service generates an invoice. In South Africa, that invoice is often sent to a woman. When childcare is unaffordable, someone must remain at home. When a clinic is inaccessible, someone must care for the sick. When food runs short, someone must decide how to stretch what remains. That person is disproportionately likely to be a woman.
- Details
By Belinda Matore, an LLD candidate and project officer at the Centre for Human Rights in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria
Childhood is increasingly defined by structure, schedules and achievement. From organised sport and cultural activities to extra lessons and enrichment programmes, many of the experiences intended to support children’s development are becoming ever more demanding. This raises an important question: what happens when activities designed to enrich children’s lives cease to feel voluntary and begin to feel compulsory?
- Details
By Olayinka Adeniyi, an LLD postdoctoral fellow, and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye of the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria
On Youth Day, 16 June, South Africa commemorates the courage of the young people who confronted injustice with extraordinary moral boldness and clarity. It is not merely a public holiday or memorial – it is a national mirror that seeks to assess what kind of society has been built with the freedom for which young people fought, resisted and sacrificed.
The youth of 1976 were changemakers who knew that education was not neutral. They realised that the classroom could reproduce oppression or promote freedom. Their protest against the education system was about more than language – it was about dignity, identity, opportunity and the right to imagine a future beyond the imposed limitations.
- Details
By Tendai Mbanje of the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria
South Africa is at a defining moment, as rising tensions around immigration test the country’s commitment to unity, tolerance and shared prosperity. In recent weeks, the streets of Durban, Johannesburg and Pretoria have witnessed regular marches, with citizens voicing frustrations over unemployment, crime and the perceived failures of the immigration system. These protests aren’t mere eruptions of anger but expressions of deep socio-economic distress. For many black South Africans, the struggle is about livelihoods, survival and the daily effort to make ends meet.
- Details
Olayinka Adeniyi LLD Post-doctoral Fellow-Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria. Prof Ebenezer Durojaye, Centre for human Rights, University of Pretoria.
On 5 June 2026, the world will mark World Environment Day. The focus for this year on climate change is urgent as well as timely. Globally and throughout Africa, the climate crisis is not a new scientific prediction or a future policy concern. It is an emerging and present occurrence which is evident in sea level rising, drought, floods, the destruction of crops, recurrent epidemics, the collapse of economy and livelihoods, and the intensifying experience of poverty.
- Details
By Tendai Mbanje, an LLD candidate at the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
For millions of South Africans, Freedom Day is not merely a holiday; it is a day of unforgettable memory, a reliving of the hopes and promises of 1994. It is a profound reminder of the sacrifices made to dismantle apartheid – and the triumph of democratic ideals.
- Details
Author Dr Dorcas Basimanyane is a development lawyer and legal scholar specialising in international trade and investments law, business and human rights, technology law and economic governance based at the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria.
Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence, Legal Pluralism, Corporate Accountability, Africa, Human Rights-Based Approach, Endogenous Governance.
Introduction
Global discourse on corporate accountability is witnessing a fundamental reorientation. For decades, the governance of transnational corporations (TNCs) regarding human rights and environmental standards was relegated to voluntary initiatives and the frequently indeterminate concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The limitations of this voluntarist approach have precipitated a decisive turn towards "hard law," as continued corporate impunity for environmental degradation, labour exploitation, and community displacement necessitates stricter regulation. The rapid proliferation global of Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence (mHRDD) legislation epitomises this shift.
- Details
By postdoctoral fellow Olayinka Adeniyi and Prof Ebenezer Durojaye of the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
The availability of safe drinking water is key to understanding Africa’s water crisis. The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme found that just 39% of Africans used safely managed drinking water in 2020, highlighting a huge disparity between Africa and better-served regions. The issue goes beyond rainfall and physical deprivation: weak infrastructure, poor service delivery, government problems and entrenched inequality decide who receives water, when and at what cost.
- Details
This year, the Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria (the Centre) commemorates the International Women’s Day in its 40th year of existence. For the women’s rights activists in the Centre, the mood is not so celebratory. Many are grappling with righteous rage. Following national and international news including current affairs leaves one at pains to choose where to direct one’s rage on any given day. Today, my righteous anger is targeted at the apparent impunity of men in power for the exploitation of women and girls as is evidenced in the Epstein files. Royalty, spiritual and wellness gurus, business and world leaders are implicated in maintaining communication and interactions with the convicted and sentenced sex offender even after his crimes had been exposed and successfully prosecuted.
